Anyway, this week I finished my second session of "Fifth Edition", played almost entirely by-the-book (only change I'm aware of is that I use d20s and d6s exclusively) and I'm starting to have a few thoughts.
I know it is heresy to say it in certain circles, but older editions (and their contemporary retro-clone rules sets) have a number of problems. This isn't an exhaustive list, but just a few things that come to mind:
- Descending Armor Class can be a bit counter-intuitive / adds an extra step
- Low level characters are incredibly fragile
- 5 minute in-game workday for spell casters: casts one spell, leave dungeon, return next day ...
- Fighters are essential, but boring one-trick-ponies: This round, roll 1d20 to hit. Next round roll 1d20 to hit. Repeat ad nauseum.
- Treasure drives advancement
- most hoards are boring piles of coins
- the amounts of treasure acquired rapidly outgrow the equipment list
- treasure-driven advancement drives a mercenary treasure hunter game rather than a heroic fantasy game ... which is perfectly fine in itself, but ignores half of the appendix N source material and much more of the fantasy genre that has emerged since 1974
Newer versions of D&D, particularly starting with the 2000 release, have done quite a bit to address these particular problems with the game, while the old school crowd has found increasing inventive ways to either embrace the "flaws" or deal with them within the older game structures (prime example being Dungeon Crawl Classics and the character funnel -- it embraces new character mortality and tosses every player a handful of characters on the assumption that only one or two will live).
Reading the newest D&D Starter Set, playing a couple sessions, and reading it again got me thinking about how most of those issues have been addressed in one way or another. Spell casters have cantrips now so their never "out" of minor spells, fighters have spell-like feats and actions that give them a bit more to do, advancement has been divorced from treasure acquisition (for better or worse), and new characters are much harder to kill.
Actual play, however, got me to think about a handful of other hurdles that the new DM needs to face -- ones that the new D&D Starter Set is largely silent on.
My four middle school players decided that they would rather pull a con and sell the goods from the wagon they were hired to escort rather than protect them and take them to their intended destination. After arriving in what the module writers assumed would be the friendly "home base" town, my players were much more inclined to look for opportunities to loot the place than to pursue "side missions".
- This set (and its predecessors) doesn't talk much about player agency and how the novice DM should handle (or support) players who don't want their characters to be heroes, but reavers instead.
In an early dust up with the Red Brands (a brigand gang), one PC was cut down and was very nearly killed (which I'm perfectly okay with).
- The Starter Set comes with five fairly complex pre-generated characters. If this fellow had failed his third death check, no real advice is given for managing a player who wants to remain involved in the game. I would have come up with something, but there really wasn't any guidance on that point for the novice DM.
- The new rules don't give the new DM any advice on what to do when a player unexpectedly misses a session.
With all the guidance given, especially in products designed to be an entry point into the hobby, it's funny what the writers of role-playing games are silent about.